RSP vs VBK
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF vs Vanguard Small Cap Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
VBK has a lower expense ratio. VBK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VBK offers more diversification with 542 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSP | VBK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $97.4B | $24.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.51% | 0.57% | |
| Holdings | 510 | 561 | |
| YTD Return | +15.05% | +17.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.43% | +29.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.91% | +16.91% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.18% | +5.29% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 19.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.9% | -59.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 24, 2003 | Jan 26, 2004 |
RSP vs VBK Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Small Cap Growth ETF (VBK) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSP returned +22.43% while VBK returned +29.45%. Year to date, RSP is up 15.05% versus a gain of 17.71% for VBK.
Over three years, RSP compounded at +14.91% per year against +16.91% for VBK; over five years the annualized figures are +9.18% and +5.29% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, RSP has the edge at +10.10% annualized vs +9.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VBK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 16.5% for RSP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.9% for RSP and -59.4% for VBK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSP charges 0.20% per year while VBK charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $5 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSP currently yields 1.51% against 0.57% for VBK.
Holdings Overlap
RSP and VBK share 30 holdings out of 945 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSP or VBK?
RSP has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VBK charges 0.05%. VBK is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSP or VBK?
Over the past year RSP returned +22.43% vs +29.45% for VBK, so VBK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), RSP annualized +10.10% vs +9.41% for VBK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSP or VBK?
VBK has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 16.5% for RSP. Worst drawdown: RSP -60.9% vs VBK -59.4%.
Should I hold both RSP and VBK?
RSP and VBK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RSP and VBK?
RSP and VBK share 30 common holdings with a 5.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 945 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSP or VBK?
RSP yields 1.51% while VBK yields 0.57%, so RSP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.