RSP vs VTI
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RSP or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. RSP is less concentrated, with 3.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $96.1B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.46% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 1,533 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +10.05% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.81% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.61% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.54% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -60.9% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,064 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 3.2%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 24, 2003 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 30, 2003 to Oct 2, 2026 (23.4 years).
RSP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 23.4 years both funds cover.
RSP vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSP returned +11.81% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, RSP is up 10.05% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, RSP compounded at +16.61% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.54% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +10.08% annualized vs +9.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.9% for RSP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSP charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSP currently yields 1.46% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.1% of RSP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 88.4% of VTI's money is in holdings RSP also owns.
Most of RSP is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, RSP as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
499 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in RSP and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 1,533 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 657 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for RSP (9.2% of the fund), and 5 for RSP that do not appear in VTI (0.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSP | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.21% | 6.40% | 6.19% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.22% | 6.29% | 6.07% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 0.24% | 4.79% | 4.55% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.21% | 3.65% | 3.44% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 0.10% | 2.90% | 2.80% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.19% | 2.56% | 2.37% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.08% | 2.31% | 2.23% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.22% | 1.70% | 1.48% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 0.19% | 1.35% | 1.16% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.22% | 1.31% | 1.09% |
99.1% of RSP is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSP or VTI?
RSP has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSP or VTI?
Over the past year RSP returned +11.81% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), RSP annualized +9.82% vs +10.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSP or VTI?
RSP has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RSP -60.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RSP and VTI?
RSP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSP and VTI?
99.1% of RSP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 88.4% of VTI's is in holdings RSP also owns. They hold 499 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in RSP and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSP or VTI?
RSP yields 1.46% while VTI yields 1.03%, so RSP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RSP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. RSP is less concentrated, with 3.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.