RSPF vs SCHD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, RSPF or SCHD?
Each has led over a different period.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. RSPF led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. RSPF is less concentrated, with 15.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPF | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $307M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 78 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +6.60% | +24.96%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.43% | +28.75%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.55%Best | +15.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.00% | +9.86%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.0% | 13.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -45.3% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,693 | $16,003Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 15.0%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2006 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 9, 2026 (14.9 years).
RSPF vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
RSPF vs SCHD Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year RSPF returned +8.43% while SCHD returned +28.75%. Year to date, RSPF is up 6.60% versus a gain of 24.96% for SCHD.
Over three years, RSPF compounded at +18.55% per year against +15.71% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +8.00% and +9.86% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.36% annualized vs +9.70%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.3% for RSPF and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPF charges 0.40% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $6 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPF currently yields 1.49% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
10.3% of RSPF's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 7.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings RSPF also owns.
RSPF and SCHD share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 77 positions we hold weights for in RSPF and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 78 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 91 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for RSPF (92.9% of the fund), and 68 for RSPF that do not appear in SCHD (88.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSPF | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BXBlackstone Group Inc. Class A | 1.38% | 2.59% | 1.21% |
| FITBFifth Third Bancorp | 1.29% | 1.19% | 0.10% |
| ARESAres Management Corp A | 1.31% | 0.74% | 0.57% |
| RFEurazeo | 1.32% | 0.62% | 0.70% |
| CINFCincinnati Financial Corp. | 1.27% | 0.64% | 0.63% |
| TROWT Rowe Price Grp | 1.28% | 0.58% | 0.70% |
| PFGPrincipalfinancialgroupinc. | 1.24% | 0.53% | 0.71% |
| ERIEErie Indemnity Co | 1.24% | 0.16% | 1.08% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RSPF and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPF or SCHD?
RSPF has an expense ratio of 0.40% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSPF or SCHD?
Over the past year RSPF returned +8.43% vs +28.75% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), RSPF annualized +9.70% vs +11.36% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSPF or SCHD?
RSPF has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: RSPF -45.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both RSPF and SCHD?
RSPF and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPF and SCHD?
10.3% of RSPF's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 7.0% of SCHD's is in holdings RSPF also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 77 positions we hold weights for in RSPF and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPF or SCHD?
RSPF yields 1.49% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than RSPF?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. RSPF led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. RSPF is less concentrated, with 15.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.