RSPT vs VTI
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RSPT or VTI?
RSPT has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSPT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. RSPT is less concentrated, with 18.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5.8B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.25% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 75 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +45.28%Best | +13.60% |
| 1Y Return | +51.40%Best | +18.17% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +34.43%Best | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.81%Best | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -59.0% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $22,694Best | $17,734 |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.2%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2006 to Sep 25, 2026 (19.9 years).
RSPT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.9 years both funds cover.
RSPT vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSPT returned +51.40% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, RSPT is up 45.28% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, RSPT compounded at +34.43% per year against +23.04% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +17.81% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, RSPT has the edge at +14.18% annualized vs +9.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.0% for RSPT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPT charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPT currently yields 0.25% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.6% of RSPT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 31.9% of VTI's money is in holdings RSPT also owns.
Most of RSPT is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
70 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in RSPT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 75 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 74 and 3,463 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,080 positions RSPT does not, 65.5% of the fund.
Largest: AMZN 3.65%, GOOGL 2.90%, GOOG 2.31%, META 1.70%, LLY 1.35%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSPT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.42% | 6.40% | 4.98% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.40% | 6.29% | 4.89% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.64% | 4.79% | 3.15% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.28% | 2.56% | 1.28% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.38% | 1.29% | 0.09% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.34% | 1.08% | 0.26% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 1.87% | 0.38% | 1.49% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 1.84% | 0.37% | 1.47% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 1.94% | 0.20% | 1.74% |
| ZBRAZebra Technologies Corp | 2.10% | 0.02% | 2.08% |
96.6% of RSPT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPT or VTI?
RSPT has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSPT or VTI?
Over the past year RSPT returned +51.40% vs +18.17% for VTI, so RSPT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), RSPT annualized +14.18% vs +9.42% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSPT or VTI?
RSPT has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RSPT -59.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RSPT and VTI?
RSPT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPT and VTI?
96.6% of RSPT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 31.9% of VTI's is in holdings RSPT also owns. They hold 70 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in RSPT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPT or VTI?
RSPT yields 0.25% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RSPT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSPT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. RSPT is less concentrated, with 18.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.