RSPT vs VTI
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSPT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6.1B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 75 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +40.12% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +57.51% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.45% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.88% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
RSPT vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSPT returned +57.51% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, RSPT is up 40.12% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, RSPT compounded at +31.45% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +16.88% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, RSPT has the edge at +14.05% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.0% for RSPT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPT charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPT currently yields 0.27% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RSPT and VTI share 66 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPT or VTI?
RSPT has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSPT or VTI?
Over the past year RSPT returned +57.51% vs +22.35% for VTI, so RSPT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), RSPT annualized +14.05% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSPT or VTI?
RSPT has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RSPT -59.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RSPT and VTI?
RSPT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPT and VTI?
RSPT and VTI share 66 common holdings with a 19.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPT or VTI?
RSPT yields 0.27% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.