SAMM vs VTI
Strategas Macro Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SAMM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SAMM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $30M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.02% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 35 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.51% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.51% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Strategas Asset Management, LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
SAMM vs VTI Performance
Strategas Macro Momentum ETF (SAMM) is a ETF from Strategas Asset Management, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SAMM returned +23.51% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, SAMM is up 7.51% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 15.0% for SAMM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.6% for SAMM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SAMM charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SAMM currently yields 1.02% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SAMM and VTI share 29 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SAMM or VTI?
SAMM has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SAMM or VTI?
Over the past year SAMM returned +23.51% vs +22.35% for VTI, so SAMM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SAMM annualized +13.03% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SAMM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 15.0% for SAMM. Worst drawdown: SAMM -24.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SAMM and VTI?
SAMM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SAMM and VTI?
SAMM and VTI share 29 common holdings with a 6.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SAMM or VTI?
SAMM yields 1.02% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.