SCDV vs VTI
Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SCDV or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCDV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $156M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.46% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 40 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +8.39% | +12.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.17% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.42% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $10,594 | $12,806Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Bahl & Gaynor | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 12, 2024 to Sep 28, 2026 (1.8 years).
SCDV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
SCDV vs VTI Performance
Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF (SCDV) is an ETF from Bahl & Gaynor and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCDV returned +7.17% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, SCDV is up 8.39% versus a gain of 12.43% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for SCDV and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCDV charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCDV currently yields 0.46% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
91.6% of SCDV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.4% of VTI's money is in holdings SCDV also owns.
Most of SCDV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
34 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in SCDV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 40 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,121 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SCDV (97.0% of the fund), and 1 for SCDV that do not appear in VTI (3.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCDV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENSGEnsign Group Inc/the | 8.19% | 0.01% | 8.18% |
| CHEChemed Corp | 5.48% | 0.01% | 5.47% |
| AHRAmerican Healthcare REIT Inc | 5.05% | 0.02% | 5.03% |
| FSSFederal Signal Corp | 4.93% | 0.01% | 4.92% |
| VCTRVictory Receivables Corp | 4.90% | 0.01% | 4.89% |
| NPOEnpro Industries Inc | 4.04% | 0.01% | 4.03% |
| TXRHTexas Roadhouse Inc | 3.40% | 0.02% | 3.38% |
| CWCurtiss-wright Corp | 3.27% | 0.04% | 3.23% |
| EVREvercore, Inc. Class A | 3.26% | 0.02% | 3.24% |
| AITApplied Industrial Technologies Inc | 3.25% | 0.02% | 3.23% |
91.6% of SCDV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCDV or VTI?
SCDV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCDV or VTI?
Over the past year SCDV returned +7.17% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SCDV annualized +3.26% vs +14.73% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCDV or VTI?
SCDV has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SCDV -22.8% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both SCDV and VTI?
SCDV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SCDV and VTI?
91.6% of SCDV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.4% of VTI's is in holdings SCDV also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in SCDV and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCDV or VTI?
SCDV yields 0.46% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SCDV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.