SLVP vs VTI
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SLVP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLVP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $950M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.69% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +107.52% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +65.99% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +27.08% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -80.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
SLVP vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLVP returned +107.52% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, SLVP is up 18.69% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, SLVP compounded at +65.99% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +27.08% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +4.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.6% for SLVP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLVP charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLVP currently yields 2.28% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLVP or VTI?
SLVP has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SLVP or VTI?
Over the past year SLVP returned +107.52% vs +21.39% for VTI, so SLVP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SLVP annualized +4.61% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SLVP or VTI?
SLVP has been the more volatile fund at 42.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SLVP -80.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SLVP and VTI?
SLVP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SLVP and VTI?
SLVP and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2821 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLVP or VTI?
SLVP yields 2.28% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SLVP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.