SLVP vs VOO
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SLVP or VOO?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SLVP led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VOO over the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLVP | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $978M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.77% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 48 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +20.25%Best | +12.23% |
| 1Y Return | +75.12%Best | +18.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +66.55%Best | +20.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +25.74%Best | +12.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.4% | 14.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -80.6% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $31,432Best | $18,230 |
| Top 10 Weight | 70.8% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2012 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 2, 2012 to Sep 9, 2026 (14.6 years).
SLVP vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.6 years both funds cover.
SLVP vs VOO Performance
iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLVP returned +75.12% while VOO returned +18.60%. Year to date, SLVP is up 20.25% versus a gain of 12.23% for VOO.
Over three years, SLVP compounded at +66.55% per year against +20.98% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +25.74% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.36% annualized vs +4.68%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.4% compared with 14.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -80.6% for SLVP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLVP charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLVP currently yields 1.77% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
4.5% of SLVP's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings SLVP also owns.
SLVP and VOO share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in SLVP and 505 in VOO, against full books of 48 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SLVP (99.3% of the fund), and 5 for SLVP that do not appear in VOO (16.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SLVP | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEMNewmont Corp. | 4.51% | 0.15% | 4.36% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SLVP and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLVP or VOO?
SLVP has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SLVP or VOO?
Over the past year SLVP returned +75.12% vs +18.60% for VOO, so SLVP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SLVP annualized +4.68% vs +13.36% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SLVP or VOO?
SLVP has been the more volatile fund at 42.4% annualized versus 14.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SLVP -80.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SLVP and VOO?
SLVP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SLVP and VOO?
4.5% of SLVP's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.1% of VOO's is in holdings SLVP also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in SLVP and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLVP or VOO?
SLVP yields 1.77% while VOO yields 1.04%, so SLVP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SLVP?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SLVP led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VOO over the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.