SRVR vs VOO
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRVR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $376M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.74% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 71 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +10.58% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.26% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.88% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.70% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SRVR vs VOO Performance
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRVR returned +3.26% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, SRVR is up 10.58% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, SRVR compounded at +5.88% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -2.70% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.0% for SRVR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRVR charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRVR currently yields 2.74% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SRVR and VOO share 12 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRVR or VOO?
SRVR has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SRVR or VOO?
Over the past year SRVR returned +3.26% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), SRVR annualized +4.69% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SRVR or VOO?
SRVR has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SRVR -41.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SRVR and VOO?
SRVR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SRVR and VOO?
SRVR and VOO share 12 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRVR or VOO?
SRVR yields 2.74% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SRVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.