SRVR vs VTI
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SRVR or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRVR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $346M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.78% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 76 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +3.02% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.88% | +18.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.86% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.54% | +12.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 17.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -41.0% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,351 | $17,734Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 71.4% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 16, 2018 to Sep 25, 2026 (8.4 years).
SRVR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.4 years both funds cover.
SRVR vs VTI Performance
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRVR returned -3.88% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, SRVR is up 3.02% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, SRVR compounded at +6.86% per year against +23.04% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -3.54% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.67% annualized vs +3.73%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 17.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.0% for SRVR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRVR charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRVR currently yields 2.78% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
76.2% of SRVR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.4% of VTI's money is in holdings SRVR also owns.
Most of SRVR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
29 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in SRVR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 76 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,134 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SRVR (96.0% of the fund), and 0 for SRVR that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SRVR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 16.25% | 0.09% | 16.16% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 15.99% | 0.14% | 15.85% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corporation | 15.14% | 0.11% | 15.03% |
| SBACSba Communications Corp. Class A Real Estate Investment Tru | 4.48% | 0.03% | 4.45% |
| IRMIron Mtn Inc New Com Npv | 4.39% | 0.05% | 4.34% |
| CCICrown Castle International Corp | 4.00% | 0.05% | 3.95% |
| IRDMIridium Communications Inc | 1.69% | 0.01% | 1.68% |
| DBRGDigitalbridge Group Inc. | 1.01% | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| SMRNuscale Power Corp Class A | 0.98% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
| FRMIFermi Inc | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.97% |
76.2% of SRVR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRVR or VTI?
SRVR has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SRVR or VTI?
Over the past year SRVR returned -3.88% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), SRVR annualized +3.73% vs +13.67% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SRVR or VTI?
SRVR has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 17.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SRVR -41.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both SRVR and VTI?
SRVR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SRVR and VTI?
76.2% of SRVR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.4% of VTI's is in holdings SRVR also owns. They hold 29 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in SRVR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRVR or VTI?
SRVR yields 2.78% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SRVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SRVR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.