SCHD vs TDNA
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs T. Rowe Price Biotech ETF
Which is better, SCHD or TDNA?
Large Cap Value against Small Cap Growth.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. TDNA is less concentrated, with 27.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | TDNA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $111.6B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.24% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 206 | 85 |
| YTD Return | +28.17%Best | -4.60% |
| 1Y Return | +33.03% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.14% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.74% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.6% | 27.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Small Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Sep 16, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
SCHD vs TDNA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SCHD vs TDNA Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and T. Rowe Price Biotech ETF (TDNA) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Year to date, SCHD is up 28.17% versus a loss of 4.60% for TDNA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while TDNA charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $55 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.24% against 0.00% for TDNA.
Holdings Overlap
3.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings TDNA also owns. 0.9% of TDNA's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.
SCHD and TDNA share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 85 in TDNA, against full books of 206 and 85.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 79 positions for TDNA that do not appear in our book for SCHD (88.6% of the fund), and 96 for SCHD that do not appear in TDNA (95.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHD | Weight in TDNA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 3.86% | 0.90% | 2.96% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and TDNA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or TDNA?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while TDNA charges 0.55%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and TDNA?
3.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings TDNA also owns. 0.9% of TDNA's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 85 in TDNA.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or TDNA?
SCHD yields 3.24% while TDNA yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TDNA better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. TDNA is less concentrated, with 27.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.