SDVD vs VTI
FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SDVD or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SDVD is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SDVD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $912M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.14% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 175 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +5.08% | +11.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.35% | +15.41%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.25% | +20.48%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.1% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $11,252 | $17,390Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 10.5%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 9, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 10, 2023 to Sep 16, 2026 (3.1 years).
SDVD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
SDVD vs VTI Performance
FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SDVD returned +7.35% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, SDVD is up 5.08% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Over three years, SDVD compounded at +5.25% per year against +20.48% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SDVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 13.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.1% for SDVD and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SDVD charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SDVD currently yields 8.14% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.2% of SDVD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.6% of VTI's money is in holdings SDVD also owns.
Most of SDVD is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
170 positions in common, counted across the 172 positions we hold weights for in SDVD and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 175 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,012 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SDVD (94.8% of the fund), and 1 for SDVD that do not appear in VTI (0.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SDVD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NHCNatl Healthcare | 1.22% | 0.00% | 1.22% |
| IBKRInteractive Brokers Group Inc | 1.13% | 0.05% | 1.08% |
| FBP:PRFirst Bancorp/puerto Rico | 1.05% | 0.01% | 1.04% |
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 0.97% | 0.08% | 0.89% |
| PSMTPricesmart Inc | 1.03% | 0.01% | 1.02% |
| THGHanover Insurance Group Inc | 1.02% | 0.01% | 1.01% |
| ENSEnersys | 1.01% | 0.01% | 1.00% |
| WTSWatts Water Technologies Inc | 1.01% | 0.01% | 1.00% |
| AIZAssurant, Inc. | 1.00% | 0.02% | 0.98% |
| RGAReinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 1.00% | 0.02% | 0.98% |
98.2% of SDVD is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SDVD or VTI?
SDVD has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SDVD or VTI?
Over the past year SDVD returned +7.35% vs +15.41% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SDVD or VTI?
SDVD has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 13.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SDVD -29.1% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both SDVD and VTI?
SDVD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SDVD and VTI?
98.2% of SDVD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.6% of VTI's is in holdings SDVD also owns. They hold 170 positions in common, counted across the 172 positions we hold weights for in SDVD and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SDVD or VTI?
SDVD yields 8.14% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SDVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SDVD?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SDVD is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.