SDVD vs SPY
FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, SDVD or SPY?
SPY has been ahead.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SDVD is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SDVD | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $912M | $804.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.14% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 175 | 505 |
| YTD Return | +7.02% | +12.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.44% | +17.51%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.86% | +21.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.1% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $11,465 | $17,831Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 10.5%Best | 38.0% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 9, 2023 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 10, 2023 to Sep 11, 2026 (3.1 years).
SDVD vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
SDVD vs SPY Performance
FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year SDVD returned +7.44% while SPY returned +17.51%. Year to date, SDVD is up 7.02% versus a gain of 12.47% for SPY.
Over three years, SDVD compounded at +5.86% per year against +21.18% for SPY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SDVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 12.8% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.1% for SDVD and -18.8% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SDVD charges 0.85% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $9 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SDVD currently yields 8.14% against 0.98% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
23.2% of SDVD's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 1.6% of SPY's money is in holdings SDVD also owns.
SDVD and SPY share little of their money.
39 positions in common, counted across the 172 positions we hold weights for in SDVD and 504 in SPY, against full books of 175 and 505.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 455 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for SDVD (97.9% of the fund), and 127 for SDVD that do not appear in SPY (72.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SDVD | Weight in SPY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBKRInteractive Brokers Group Inc | 1.13% | 0.06% | 1.07% |
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 0.97% | 0.09% | 0.88% |
| AIZAssurant, Inc. | 1.00% | 0.02% | 0.98% |
| WSMWilliams-sonoma Inc | 0.96% | 0.04% | 0.92% |
| VRSNVerisign Inc. | 0.91% | 0.04% | 0.87% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc. | 0.87% | 0.06% | 0.81% |
| FOXAFox Corp. Class A | 0.90% | 0.02% | 0.88% |
| SNASnap-On Inc. | 0.89% | 0.03% | 0.86% |
| EMEEmcor Group Inc | 0.87% | 0.05% | 0.82% |
| CINFCincinnati Financial Corp. | 0.87% | 0.04% | 0.83% |
23.2% of SDVD is already inside SPY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SDVD or SPY?
SDVD has an expense ratio of 0.85% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SDVD or SPY?
Over the past year SDVD returned +7.44% vs +17.51% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SDVD or SPY?
SDVD has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 12.8% for SPY. Worst drawdown: SDVD -29.1% vs SPY -18.8%.
Should I hold both SDVD and SPY?
SDVD and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SDVD and SPY?
23.2% of SDVD's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 1.6% of SPY's is in holdings SDVD also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 172 positions we hold weights for in SDVD and 504 in SPY.
Which pays a higher dividend, SDVD or SPY?
SDVD yields 8.14% while SPY yields 0.98%, so SDVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than SDVD?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SDVD is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.