SDVD vs VOO
FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SDVD or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SDVD is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SDVD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $912M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.14% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 175 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +5.04% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.30% | +17.03%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.23% | +21.25%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.1% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $11,246 | $17,776Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 10.5%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 9, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 10, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (3.1 years).
SDVD vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
SDVD vs VOO Performance
FT Vest SMID Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (SDVD) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SDVD returned +7.30% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, SDVD is up 5.04% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, SDVD compounded at +5.23% per year against +21.25% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SDVD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 12.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.1% for SDVD and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SDVD charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SDVD currently yields 8.14% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
22.9% of SDVD's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.6% of VOO's money is in holdings SDVD also owns.
SDVD and VOO share little of their money.
39 positions in common, counted across the 172 positions we hold weights for in SDVD and 494 in VOO, against full books of 175 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 448 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SDVD (97.6% of the fund), and 130 for SDVD that do not appear in VOO (74.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SDVD | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBKRInteractive Brokers Group Inc | 1.13% | 0.06% | 1.07% |
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 0.97% | 0.09% | 0.88% |
| AIZAssurant, Inc. | 1.00% | 0.02% | 0.98% |
| WSMWilliams-sonoma Inc | 0.96% | 0.04% | 0.92% |
| VRSNVerisign Inc. | 0.91% | 0.04% | 0.87% |
| EMEEmcor Group Inc | 0.87% | 0.06% | 0.81% |
| FOXAFox Corp. Class A | 0.90% | 0.02% | 0.88% |
| SNASnap-On Inc. | 0.89% | 0.03% | 0.86% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 0.87% | 0.05% | 0.82% |
| CINFCincinnati Financial Corp. | 0.87% | 0.04% | 0.83% |
22.9% of SDVD is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SDVD or VOO?
SDVD has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SDVD or VOO?
Over the past year SDVD returned +7.30% vs +17.03% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SDVD or VOO?
SDVD has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 12.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SDVD -29.1% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both SDVD and VOO?
SDVD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SDVD and VOO?
22.9% of SDVD's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.6% of VOO's is in holdings SDVD also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 172 positions we hold weights for in SDVD and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SDVD or VOO?
SDVD yields 8.14% while VOO yields 1.04%, so SDVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SDVD?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SDVD is less concentrated, with 10.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.