SGRW vs VTI
Harbor Active Small Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SGRW or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SGRW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $28M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 139 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +21.86%Best | +11.65% |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.72% |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 14, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
SGRW vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SGRW vs VTI Performance
Harbor Active Small Cap Growth ETF (SGRW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SGRW is up 21.86% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SGRW charges 0.80% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SGRW currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 67.5% of SGRW's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
100 positions in common, counted across the 134 positions we hold weights for in SGRW and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 139 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SGRW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MGNIMagnite Inc | 2.41% | 0.00% | 2.41% |
| CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc., Class A | 1.99% | 0.00% | 1.99% |
| SIBNSi-Bone Inc | 1.92% | 0.00% | 1.92% |
| FTAIFTAI Aviation Ltd | 1.85% | 0.04% | 1.81% |
| GTESGates Industrial Corporation Plc Com USD | 1.73% | 0.00% | 1.73% |
| FROGJfrog Ltd. | 1.72% | 0.01% | 1.71% |
| KIDSOrthopediatrics Corp.(kids) | 1.69% | 0.00% | 1.69% |
| ROLLRbc Bearings Inc | 1.58% | 0.03% | 1.55% |
| NTNXNutanix Inc | 1.58% | 0.02% | 1.56% |
| TCBITexas Capital Bancshares Inc | 1.51% | 0.00% | 1.51% |
67.5% of SGRW is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SGRW or VTI?
SGRW has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between SGRW and VTI?
At least 67.5% of SGRW's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 100 positions in common, counted across the 134 positions we hold weights for in SGRW and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SGRW or VTI?
SGRW yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SGRW?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.