SHOC vs VTI
Strive US Semiconductor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SHOC or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SHOC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SHOC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $224M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 32 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +45.66%Best | +12.28% |
| 1Y Return | +73.79%Best | +16.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +46.51%Best | +20.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.6% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -37.6% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $41,358Best | $20,869 |
| Top 10 Weight | 78.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 6, 2022 to Sep 17, 2026 (3.9 years).
SHOC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
SHOC vs VTI Performance
Strive US Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) is an ETF from Strive Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SHOC returned +73.79% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, SHOC is up 45.66% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Over three years, SHOC compounded at +46.51% per year against +20.89% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, SHOC has the edge at +43.91% annualized vs +20.76%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SHOC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.6% compared with 13.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.6% for SHOC and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SHOC charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SHOC currently yields 0.13% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
91.2% of SHOC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 15.0% of VTI's money is in holdings SHOC also owns.
Most of SHOC is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
24 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in SHOC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 32 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,126 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SHOC (82.4% of the fund), and 4 for SHOC that do not appear in VTI (2.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SHOC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 22.56% | 6.40% | 16.16% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 13.57% | 1.29% | 12.28% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 11.05% | 2.56% | 8.49% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.81% | 1.08% | 3.73% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 4.90% | 0.56% | 4.34% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 4.72% | 0.51% | 4.21% |
| KLACKla Corp | 4.20% | 0.33% | 3.87% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 3.89% | 0.35% | 3.54% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 3.42% | 0.50% | 2.92% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 3.46% | 0.23% | 3.23% |
91.2% of SHOC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SHOC or VTI?
SHOC has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SHOC or VTI?
Over the past year SHOC returned +73.79% vs +16.78% for VTI, so SHOC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SHOC annualized +43.91% vs +20.76% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SHOC or VTI?
SHOC has been the more volatile fund at 32.6% annualized versus 13.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SHOC -37.6% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both SHOC and VTI?
SHOC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SHOC and VTI?
91.2% of SHOC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 15.0% of VTI's is in holdings SHOC also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in SHOC and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SHOC or VTI?
SHOC yields 0.13% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SHOC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SHOC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.