SHOC vs VTI
Strive US Semiconductor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SHOC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SHOC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $244M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +48.02% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +88.83% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +46.46% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
SHOC vs VTI Performance
Strive US Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) is a ETF from Strive Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SHOC returned +88.83% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, SHOC is up 48.02% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, SHOC compounded at +46.46% per year against +21.54% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, SHOC has the edge at +45.55% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SHOC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.6% for SHOC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SHOC charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SHOC currently yields 0.14% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SHOC and VTI share 24 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SHOC or VTI?
SHOC has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SHOC or VTI?
Over the past year SHOC returned +88.83% vs +21.39% for VTI, so SHOC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SHOC annualized +45.55% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SHOC or VTI?
SHOC has been the more volatile fund at 32.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SHOC -37.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SHOC and VTI?
SHOC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SHOC and VTI?
SHOC and VTI share 24 common holdings with a 16.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SHOC or VTI?
SHOC yields 0.14% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.