SHOC vs VYM
Strive US Semiconductor ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, SHOC or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SHOC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SHOC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $224M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.13% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 32 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +41.05%Best | +11.71% |
| 1Y Return | +66.69%Best | +16.24% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +45.00%Best | +17.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.8% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -37.6% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $40,105Best | $17,888 |
| Top 10 Weight | 78.2% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Strive Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 6, 2022 to Sep 16, 2026 (3.9 years).
SHOC vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
SHOC vs VYM Performance
Strive US Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) is an ETF from Strive Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SHOC returned +66.69% while VYM returned +16.24%. Year to date, SHOC is up 41.05% versus a gain of 11.71% for VYM.
Over three years, SHOC compounded at +45.00% per year against +17.24% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, SHOC has the edge at +42.78% annualized vs +16.08%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SHOC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.8% compared with 11.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.6% for SHOC and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SHOC charges 0.40% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $4 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SHOC currently yields 0.13% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
22.6% of SHOC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.4% of VYM's money is in holdings SHOC also owns.
SHOC and VYM share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in SHOC and 557 in VYM, against full books of 32 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 521 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for SHOC (86.7% of the fund), and 21 for SHOC that do not appear in VYM (71.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SHOC | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 11.05% | 7.35% | 3.70% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 3.89% | 1.02% | 2.87% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 3.22% | 0.73% | 2.49% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 1.64% | 0.63% | 1.01% |
| TELTE Connectivity Ltd | 1.08% | 0.24% | 0.84% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 1.04% | 0.24% | 0.80% |
| MCHPMicrochip Technology Inc. | 0.71% | 0.16% | 0.55% |
22.6% of SHOC is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SHOC or VYM?
SHOC has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SHOC or VYM?
Over the past year SHOC returned +66.69% vs +16.24% for VYM, so SHOC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SHOC annualized +42.78% vs +16.08% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SHOC or VYM?
SHOC has been the more volatile fund at 32.8% annualized versus 11.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SHOC -37.6% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both SHOC and VYM?
SHOC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SHOC and VYM?
22.6% of SHOC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.4% of VYM's is in holdings SHOC also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in SHOC and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, SHOC or VYM?
SHOC yields 0.13% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than SHOC?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SHOC led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.