SLVR vs VTI
Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SLVR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLVR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $747M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.30% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 78 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +6.76% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +87.64% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 52.9% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 14, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
SLVR vs VTI Performance
Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLVR returned +87.64% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, SLVR is up 6.76% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 52.9% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.7% for SLVR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLVR charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLVR currently yields 4.30% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SLVR and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SLVR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDE | 2.15% | 0.02% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLVR or VTI?
SLVR has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SLVR or VTI?
Over the past year SLVR returned +87.64% vs +22.43% for VTI, so SLVR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SLVR annualized +95.42% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SLVR or VTI?
SLVR has been the more volatile fund at 52.9% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SLVR -43.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SLVR and VTI?
SLVR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SLVR and VTI?
SLVR and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLVR or VTI?
SLVR yields 4.30% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SLVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.