SLVR vs VTI
Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SLVR or VTI?
Silver against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SLVR led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLVR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $767M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.27% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 78 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -0.63% | +12.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | +29.05%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.42% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 55.2% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -43.7% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $26,768Best | $13,031 |
| Top 10 Weight | 73.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Silver | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 14, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 15, 2025 to Sep 28, 2026 (1.7 years).
SLVR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
SLVR vs VTI Performance
Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF (SLVR) is an ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLVR returned +29.05% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, SLVR is down 0.63% versus a gain of 12.43% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 55.2% compared with 13.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.7% for SLVR and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLVR charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLVR currently yields 3.27% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
4.2% of SLVR's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
SLVR and VTI share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 78 positions we hold weights for in SLVR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 78 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,148 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SLVR (97.4% of the fund), and 2 for SLVR that do not appear in VTI (0.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SLVR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLVR or VTI?
SLVR has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SLVR or VTI?
Over the past year SLVR returned +29.05% vs +15.92% for VTI, so SLVR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SLVR annualized +78.46% vs +16.85% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SLVR or VTI?
SLVR has been the more volatile fund at 55.2% annualized versus 13.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SLVR -43.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both SLVR and VTI?
SLVR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SLVR and VTI?
4.2% of SLVR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings SLVR also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 78 positions we hold weights for in SLVR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLVR or VTI?
SLVR yields 3.27% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SLVR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SLVR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SLVR led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 73.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.