SNAV vs VYM
Mohr Sector Nav ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNAV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.59% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $29M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +11.70% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.14% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.31% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Mohr Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 10, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
SNAV vs VYM Performance
Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) is a ETF from Mohr Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNAV returned +18.14% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, SNAV is up 11.70% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, SNAV compounded at +14.31% per year against +18.43% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, SNAV has the edge at +14.28% annualized vs +7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 11.7% for SNAV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for SNAV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNAV charges 1.59% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $159 vs $4 annually, a gap of $155 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNAV currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
SNAV and VYM share 0 holdings out of 568 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNAV or VYM?
SNAV has an expense ratio of 1.59% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $155 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SNAV or VYM?
Over the past year SNAV returned +18.14% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SNAV annualized +14.28% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SNAV or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 11.7% for SNAV. Worst drawdown: SNAV -16.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both SNAV and VYM?
SNAV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SNAV and VYM?
SNAV and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 568 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNAV or VYM?
SNAV yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.