SNAV vs VOO
Mohr Sector Nav ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNAV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $29M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.85% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.89% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.35% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Mohr Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 10, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SNAV vs VOO Performance
Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) is a ETF from Mohr Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNAV returned +16.89% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, SNAV is up 11.85% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, SNAV compounded at +14.35% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, SNAV has the edge at +14.31% annualized vs +13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 11.7% for SNAV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for SNAV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNAV charges 1.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $159 vs $3 annually, a gap of $156 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNAV currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SNAV and VOO share 0 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNAV or VOO?
SNAV has an expense ratio of 1.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $156 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SNAV or VOO?
Over the past year SNAV returned +16.89% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SNAV annualized +14.31% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SNAV or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 11.7% for SNAV. Worst drawdown: SNAV -16.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SNAV and VOO?
SNAV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between SNAV and VOO?
SNAV and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNAV or VOO?
SNAV yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.