SNAV vs VXUS
Mohr Sector Nav ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNAV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.59% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $29M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +11.60% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.75% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.24% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Mohr Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 10, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SNAV vs VXUS Performance
Mohr Sector Nav ETF (SNAV) is a ETF from Mohr Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNAV returned +18.75% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, SNAV is up 11.60% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, SNAV compounded at +14.24% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, SNAV has the edge at +14.30% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.7% for SNAV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for SNAV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNAV charges 1.59% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $159 vs $5 annually, a gap of $154 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNAV currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
SNAV and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7871 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNAV or VXUS?
SNAV has an expense ratio of 1.59% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $154 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SNAV or VXUS?
Over the past year SNAV returned +18.75% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SNAV annualized +14.30% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SNAV or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.7% for SNAV. Worst drawdown: SNAV -16.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SNAV and VXUS?
SNAV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SNAV and VXUS?
SNAV and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7871 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNAV or VXUS?
SNAV yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.