SPFF vs VOO
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPFF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $145M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.62% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +4.49% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.27% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.91% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.69% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 16, 2012 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SPFF vs VOO Performance
Global X SuperIncome Preferred ETF (SPFF) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SPFF returned +10.27% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, SPFF is up 4.49% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, SPFF compounded at +9.91% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +1.69% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 9.3% for SPFF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for SPFF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPFF charges 0.48% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPFF currently yields 6.62% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPFF or VOO?
SPFF has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPFF or VOO?
Over the past year SPFF returned +10.27% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), SPFF annualized -0.81% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPFF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 9.3% for SPFF. Worst drawdown: SPFF -50.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SPFF and VOO?
SPFF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SPFF and VOO?
SPFF and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPFF or VOO?
SPFF yields 6.62% while VOO yields 1.08%, so SPFF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.