SPY vs TFGZ

SPY vs TFGZ

Which is better, SPY or TFGZ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns (1Y): SPYLess Concentrated: SPY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSPYTFGZ
Expense Ratio0.09%Best0.79%
AUM$804.7B$7M
Dividend Yield0.98%0.00%
Holdings50544
YTD Return+12.47%+15.17%Best
1Y Return+17.51%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.18%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.88%-
Top 10 Weight38.0%Best47.9%
Fund FamilyState Street Investment ManagementThornburg Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJan 22, 1993Apr 1, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

SPY vs TFGZ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SPY vs TFGZ Performance

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF (TFGZ) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, SPY is up 12.47% versus a gain of 15.17% for TFGZ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SPY charges 0.09% per year while TFGZ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $79 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 0.98% against 0.00% for TFGZ.

Holdings Overlap

SPY already in TFGZ17.3%
TFGZ already in SPY45.2%

17.3% of SPY's money is in holdings TFGZ also owns. 45.2% of TFGZ's money is in holdings SPY also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

13 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 43 in TFGZ, against full books of 505 and 44.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 23 positions for TFGZ that do not appear in our book for SPY (43.6% of the fund), and 481 for SPY that do not appear in TFGZ (82.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SPYWeight in TFGZDifference
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0013.33%11.09%7.76%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 375.50%7.61%2.11%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.97%5.71%2.74%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.1.94%3.02%1.08%
MAMastercard Inc0.69%3.20%2.51%
LRCXLam Research Corp0.60%3.23%2.63%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.51%1.48%0.03%
VRTVertiv Group Corp0.16%2.53%2.37%
SPGIS&p Global Inc0.19%2.47%2.28%
DDOGDatadog Inc. Class A0.14%2.31%2.17%

45.2% of TFGZ is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SPYTFGZ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SPY or TFGZ?

SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while TFGZ charges 0.79%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between SPY and TFGZ?

45.2% of TFGZ's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 45.2% of TFGZ's is in holdings SPY also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 43 in TFGZ.

Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or TFGZ?

SPY yields 0.98% while TFGZ yields 0.00%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TFGZ better than SPY?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.