TINT vs VOO
Proshares Smart Materials ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TINT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TINT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.18% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +23.71% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.50% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.23% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.6% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 26, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
TINT vs VOO Performance
Proshares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TINT returned +29.50% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, TINT is up 23.71% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, TINT compounded at +10.23% per year against +22.19% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +2.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TINT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.6% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.5% for TINT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TINT charges 0.58% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TINT currently yields 1.18% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TINT or VOO?
TINT has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TINT or VOO?
Over the past year TINT returned +29.50% vs +21.79% for VOO, so TINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), TINT annualized +2.22% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TINT or VOO?
TINT has been the more volatile fund at 23.6% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TINT -41.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both TINT and VOO?
TINT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TINT and VOO?
TINT and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 4.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 533 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TINT or VOO?
TINT yields 1.18% while VOO yields 1.08%, so TINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.