TMDV vs VXUS
ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TMDV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $5M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.46% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 66 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +14.81% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.16% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.05% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.12% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2019 | Jan 26, 2011 |
TMDV vs VXUS Performance
ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TMDV returned +12.16% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, TMDV is up 14.81% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, TMDV compounded at +7.05% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +4.12% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, TMDV has the edge at +6.82% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TMDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for TMDV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TMDV charges 0.35% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $5 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TMDV currently yields 2.46% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
TMDV and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 7933 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TMDV | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCL | 1.61% | 0.00% | 1.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TMDV or VXUS?
TMDV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TMDV or VXUS?
Over the past year TMDV returned +12.16% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), TMDV annualized +6.82% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TMDV or VXUS?
TMDV has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: TMDV -33.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both TMDV and VXUS?
TMDV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TMDV and VXUS?
TMDV and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7933 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TMDV or VXUS?
TMDV yields 2.46% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.