TMDV vs VTI
ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, TMDV or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. TMDV is less concentrated, with 18.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TMDV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.46% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 66 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +5.79% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.99% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.37% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.55% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3%Best | 17.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,906 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.0%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2019 to Oct 2, 2026 (6.9 years).
TMDV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.9 years both funds cover.
TMDV vs VTI Performance
ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TMDV returned +4.99% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, TMDV is up 5.79% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, TMDV compounded at +7.37% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.55% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.91% annualized vs +5.43%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 16.3% for TMDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for TMDV and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TMDV charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TMDV currently yields 2.46% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.8% of TMDV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.0% of VTI's money is in holdings TMDV also owns.
Most of TMDV is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
65 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in TMDV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 66 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 65 and 3,463 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,098 positions TMDV does not, 91.5% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 6.40%, AAPL 6.29%, MSFT 4.79%, AMZN 3.65%, GOOGL 2.90%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TMDV | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.84% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.74% | 0.52% | 1.22% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.64% | 0.42% | 1.22% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.38% | 0.68% | 0.70% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.86% | 0.15% | 1.71% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 1.75% | 0.26% | 1.49% |
| GPCGenuine Parts Company | 1.98% | 0.02% | 1.96% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.50% | 0.47% | 1.03% |
| BDXBecton Dickinson And Co. | 1.89% | 0.06% | 1.83% |
| MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.78% | 0.15% | 1.63% |
99.8% of TMDV is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TMDV or VTI?
TMDV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TMDV or VTI?
Over the past year TMDV returned +4.99% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), TMDV annualized +5.43% vs +14.91% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TMDV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 16.3% for TMDV. Worst drawdown: TMDV -33.4% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both TMDV and VTI?
TMDV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TMDV and VTI?
99.8% of TMDV's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 6.0% of VTI's is in holdings TMDV also owns. They hold 65 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in TMDV and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, TMDV or VTI?
TMDV yields 2.46% while VTI yields 1.03%, so TMDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than TMDV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. TMDV is less concentrated, with 18.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.