IVV vs TMDV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF
Which is better, IVV or TMDV?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. TMDV is less concentrated, with 17.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TMDV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.35% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $5M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.46% |
| Holdings | 508 | 66 |
| YTD Return | +12.24%Best | +10.18% |
| 1Y Return | +18.61%Best | +7.76% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.98%Best | +6.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76%Best | +3.70% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 16.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,230Best | $11,992 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 17.4%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | ProShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 5, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2019 to Sep 9, 2026 (6.8 years).
IVV vs TMDV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TMDV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) is an ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% while TMDV returned +7.76%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.24% versus a gain of 10.18% for TMDV.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.98% per year against +6.46% for TMDV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.76% and +3.70% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +15.43% annualized vs +6.11%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 16.2% for TMDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -33.4% for TMDV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TMDV charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.46% for TMDV.
Holdings Overlap
6.4% of IVV's money is in holdings TMDV also owns. 62.0% of TMDV's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
40 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 64 in TMDV, against full books of 508 and 66.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 505 and 64 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 456 positions TMDV does not, 92.9% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.98%, AAPL 6.86%, MSFT 5.44%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TMDV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.93% | 1.58% | 0.65% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 0.74% | 1.36% | 0.62% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.51% | 1.53% | 1.02% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 0.28% | 1.72% | 1.44% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.52% | 1.46% | 0.94% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.51% | 1.44% | 0.93% |
| GPCGenuine Parts Company | 0.03% | 1.87% | 1.84% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing Inc. | 0.16% | 1.74% | 1.58% |
| SHWSherwin Williams Co/the | 0.13% | 1.70% | 1.57% |
| SWKStanley Black Decker Inc. | 0.02% | 1.81% | 1.79% |
62.0% of TMDV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TMDV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TMDV charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TMDV?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.61% vs +7.76% for TMDV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +15.43% vs +6.11% for TMDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TMDV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 16.2% for TMDV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs TMDV -33.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and TMDV?
IVV and TMDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TMDV?
62.0% of TMDV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 62.0% of TMDV's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 40 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 64 in TMDV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TMDV?
IVV yields 1.06% while TMDV yields 2.46%, so TMDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TMDV better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. TMDV is less concentrated, with 17.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.