TMDV vs VOO
ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, TMDV or VOO?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. TMDV is less concentrated, with 17.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TMDV | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.46% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 66 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +12.24% | +13.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.89% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.04% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.07% | +12.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2%Best | 16.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,208 | $18,335Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 17.4%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 5, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2019 to Sep 4, 2026 (6.8 years).
TMDV vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.8 years both funds cover.
TMDV vs VOO Performance
ProShares Russell US Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TMDV returned +8.89% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, TMDV is up 12.24% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, TMDV compounded at +7.04% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.07% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.68% annualized vs +6.41%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 16.2% for TMDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for TMDV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TMDV charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TMDV currently yields 2.46% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
60.5% of TMDV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 6.3% of VOO's money is in holdings TMDV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
39 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in TMDV and 504 in VOO, against full books of 66 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 64 and 504 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 455 positions TMDV does not, 93.0% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.51%, AAPL 6.59%, MSFT 4.30%, AMZN 3.62%, GOOGL 3.25%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TMDV | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.58% | 0.95% | 0.63% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.36% | 0.77% | 0.59% |
| KOCoca-cola Co. | 1.53% | 0.49% | 1.04% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 1.72% | 0.25% | 1.47% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.44% | 0.53% | 0.91% |
| CVXChevron Corp.United States -Energy | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.98% |
| GPCGenuine Parts Co | 1.87% | 0.03% | 1.84% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.74% | 0.14% | 1.60% |
| SWKStanley Black & Decker Inc. | 1.81% | 0.02% | 1.79% |
| SHWSherwin Williams Co | 1.70% | 0.12% | 1.58% |
60.5% of TMDV is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TMDV or VOO?
TMDV has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TMDV or VOO?
Over the past year TMDV returned +8.89% vs +20.08% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), TMDV annualized +6.41% vs +15.68% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TMDV or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 16.2% for TMDV. Worst drawdown: TMDV -33.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both TMDV and VOO?
TMDV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TMDV and VOO?
60.5% of TMDV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 6.3% of VOO's is in holdings TMDV also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 64 positions we hold weights for in TMDV and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, TMDV or VOO?
TMDV yields 2.46% while VOO yields 1.08%, so TMDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than TMDV?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. TMDV is less concentrated, with 17.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.