TRFK vs VXUS
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, TRFK or VXUS?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. TRFK led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TRFK | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $1.0B | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 100 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +43.42%Best | +15.57% |
| 1Y Return | +52.62%Best | +27.46% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +42.37%Best | +20.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.96% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.1% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.1% | -16.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $37,448Best | $18,144 |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 9, 2022 to Sep 3, 2026 (4.2 years).
TRFK vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
TRFK vs VXUS Performance
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TRFK returned +52.62% while VXUS returned +27.46%. Year to date, TRFK is up 43.42% versus a gain of 15.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, TRFK compounded at +42.37% per year against +20.30% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, TRFK has the edge at +36.94% annualized vs +15.24%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TRFK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.1% compared with 14.8% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.1% for TRFK and -16.2% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TRFK charges 0.49% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $5 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TRFK currently yields 0.01% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 13.5% of TRFK's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
TRFK and VXUS share little of their money.
16 positions in common, counted across the 95 positions we hold weights for in TRFK and 8,094 in VXUS, against full books of 100 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TRFK | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 000660:KRSk Hynix | 5.28% | 2.17% | 3.11% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 2.70% | 0.00% | 2.70% |
| 285A:JPKioxia Holdings Corporation | 2.10% | 0.43% | 1.67% |
| ABBN:SMABB Ltd. - Ordinary Shares | 2.15% | 0.37% | 1.78% |
| NOKIA:FINokia Oyj | 0.67% | 0.15% | 0.52% |
| 5801:TKFurukawa Electric Co Ltd | 0.18% | 0.05% | 0.13% |
| 4704:JPTrend Micro Inc/japan | 0.07% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
| HUBN:SMHuber & Suhner Ag | 0.05% | 0.01% | 0.04% |
| CENER:ATCenergy Holdings Sa | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% |
| 3896:KYKingsoft Cloud Holdings Ltd | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of TRFK and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TRFK or VXUS?
TRFK has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TRFK or VXUS?
Over the past year TRFK returned +52.62% vs +27.46% for VXUS, so TRFK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TRFK annualized +36.94% vs +15.24% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TRFK or VXUS?
TRFK has been the more volatile fund at 30.1% annualized versus 14.8% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: TRFK -29.1% vs VXUS -16.2%.
Should I hold both TRFK and VXUS?
TRFK and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TRFK and VXUS?
At least 13.5% of TRFK's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 95 positions we hold weights for in TRFK and 8,094 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, TRFK or VXUS?
TRFK yields 0.01% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than TRFK?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. TRFK led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.