TRFK vs VOO
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TRFK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TRFK | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $948M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 85 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +51.11% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +55.65% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +47.37% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
TRFK vs VOO Performance
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TRFK returned +55.65% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, TRFK is up 51.11% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, TRFK compounded at +47.37% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, TRFK has the edge at +39.29% annualized vs +13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TRFK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.1% for TRFK and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TRFK charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TRFK currently yields 0.01% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
TRFK and VOO share 25 holdings out of 561 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TRFK or VOO?
TRFK has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TRFK or VOO?
Over the past year TRFK returned +55.65% vs +21.63% for VOO, so TRFK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TRFK annualized +39.29% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TRFK or VOO?
TRFK has been the more volatile fund at 30.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TRFK -29.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both TRFK and VOO?
TRFK and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TRFK and VOO?
TRFK and VOO share 25 common holdings with a 17.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 561 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TRFK or VOO?
TRFK yields 0.01% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.