TYLG vs VGI
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Virtus Global Multi-Sector Income Fund
Quick Verdict
TYLG has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VGI offers more diversification with 646 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TYLG | VGI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 1.74% | |
| AUM | $15M | $88M | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.89% | 12.31% | |
| Holdings | 78 | 646 | |
| YTD Return | +20.94% | +1.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.81% | +4.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.52% | +12.01% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +2.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5% | -63.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Virtus Investment Partners | |
| Category | Alternative | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Nov 21, 2022 | Feb 23, 2012 |
TYLG vs VGI Performance
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Virtus Global Multi-Sector Income Fund (VGI) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past year TYLG returned +34.81% while VGI returned +4.23%. Year to date, TYLG is up 20.94% versus a gain of 1.12% for VGI.
Over three years, TYLG compounded at +23.52% per year against +12.01% for VGI. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +25.07% annualized vs -2.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 14.1% for VGI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for TYLG and -63.3% for VGI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TYLG charges 0.60% per year while VGI charges 1.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $174 annually, a gap of $114 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TYLG currently yields 8.89% against 12.31% for VGI.
Holdings Overlap
TYLG and VGI share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TYLG or VGI?
TYLG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VGI charges 1.74%. TYLG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $114 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TYLG or VGI?
Over the past year TYLG returned +34.81% vs +4.23% for VGI, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TYLG annualized +25.07% vs -2.40% for VGI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TYLG or VGI?
TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VGI. Worst drawdown: TYLG -24.5% vs VGI -63.3%.
Should I hold both TYLG and VGI?
TYLG and VGI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TYLG and VGI?
TYLG and VGI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TYLG or VGI?
TYLG yields 8.89% while VGI yields 12.31%, so VGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.