TYLG vs VOO
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, TYLG or VOO?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TYLG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TYLG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $15M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.68% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 77 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +22.48%Best | +11.48% |
| 1Y Return | +30.69%Best | +15.94% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.82%Best | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.66% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $23,320Best | $19,905 |
| Top 10 Weight | 81.6% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 21, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 22, 2022 to Sep 15, 2026 (3.8 years).
TYLG vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.
TYLG vs VOO Performance
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TYLG returned +30.69% while VOO returned +15.94%. Year to date, TYLG is up 22.48% versus a gain of 11.48% for VOO.
Over three years, TYLG compounded at +23.82% per year against +21.01% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +24.96% annualized vs +19.86%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 13.0% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for TYLG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TYLG charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TYLG currently yields 8.68% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
46.5% of TYLG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 36.5% of VOO's money is in holdings TYLG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
71 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in TYLG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 77 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 74 and 494 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 416 positions TYLG does not, 62.7% of the fund.
Largest: AMZN 4.13%, GOOGL 3.24%, GOOG 2.62%, META 1.90%, JPM 1.46%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TYLG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.74% | 7.55% | 0.81% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.11% | 7.05% | 0.94% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.77% | 5.36% | 0.59% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.24% | 2.86% | 0.62% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.85% | 1.44% | 0.41% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.83% | 1.21% | 0.62% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.35% | 0.71% | 0.64% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.37% | 0.66% | 0.71% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 1.29% | 0.44% | 0.85% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.10% | 0.63% | 0.47% |
46.5% of TYLG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TYLG or VOO?
TYLG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TYLG or VOO?
Over the past year TYLG returned +30.69% vs +15.94% for VOO, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TYLG annualized +24.96% vs +19.86% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TYLG or VOO?
TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 13.0% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TYLG -24.5% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both TYLG and VOO?
TYLG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TYLG and VOO?
46.5% of TYLG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 36.5% of VOO's is in holdings TYLG also owns. They hold 71 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in TYLG and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, TYLG or VOO?
TYLG yields 8.68% while VOO yields 1.04%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than TYLG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TYLG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.