TYLG vs VOO

TYLG vs VOO

Which is better, TYLG or VOO?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. TYLG led over 1Y and the full window, VOO over 3Y.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTYLGVOO
Expense Ratio0.60%0.03%Best
AUM$13M$1.0T
Dividend Yield8.86%1.05%
Holdings157519
YTD Return+15.25%Best+10.69%
1Y Return+15.02%Best+11.33%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.55%+21.04%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.65%
Volatility (annualized)16.3%12.8%Best
Max Drawdown-24.5%-18.7%Best
$10,000 over 4 years$22,161Best$19,926
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 21, 2022Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 22, 2022 to Nov 10, 2026 (4 years).

TYLG vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4 years both funds cover.

TYLG vs VOO Performance

Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TYLG returned +15.02% while VOO returned +11.33%. Year to date, TYLG is up 15.25% versus a gain of 10.69% for VOO.

Over three years, TYLG compounded at +19.55% per year against +21.04% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +22.01% annualized vs +18.81%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 12.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for TYLG and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TYLG charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TYLG currently yields 8.86% against 1.05% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of TYLG and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

TYLGVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TYLG or VOO?

TYLG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, TYLG or VOO?

Over the past year TYLG returned +15.02% vs +11.33% for VOO, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TYLG annualized +22.01% vs +18.81% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, TYLG or VOO?

TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 12.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TYLG -24.5% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both TYLG and VOO?

TYLG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, TYLG or VOO?

TYLG yields 8.86% while VOO yields 1.05%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than TYLG?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. TYLG led over 1Y and the full window, VOO over 3Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.