TYLG vs VTI
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. TYLG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TYLG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $15M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.89% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 78 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +21.18% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.64% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.66% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 21, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
TYLG vs VTI Performance
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TYLG returned +35.64% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, TYLG is up 21.18% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, TYLG compounded at +23.66% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +25.12% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for TYLG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TYLG charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TYLG currently yields 8.89% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
TYLG and VTI share 65 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 32.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TYLG or VTI?
TYLG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TYLG or VTI?
Over the past year TYLG returned +35.64% vs +22.35% for VTI, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TYLG annualized +25.12% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TYLG or VTI?
TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TYLG -24.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TYLG and VTI?
TYLG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TYLG and VTI?
TYLG and VTI share 65 common holdings with a 32.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TYLG or VTI?
TYLG yields 8.89% while VTI yields 1.07%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.