TYLG vs VTI
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, TYLG or VTI?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. TYLG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TYLG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $15M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.68% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 154 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +30.79%Best | +14.27% |
| 1Y Return | +34.91%Best | +16.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.38%Best | +22.74% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $25,136Best | $20,196 |
| Top 10 Weight | 81.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 21, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 22, 2022 to Oct 7, 2026 (3.9 years).
TYLG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
TYLG vs VTI Performance
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TYLG returned +34.91% while VTI returned +16.92%. Year to date, TYLG is up 30.79% versus a gain of 14.27% for VTI.
Over three years, TYLG compounded at +26.38% per year against +22.74% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +26.66% annualized vs +19.75%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 13.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for TYLG and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TYLG charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TYLG currently yields 8.68% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
46.4% of TYLG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 31.9% of VTI's money is in holdings TYLG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, TYLG as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
70 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in TYLG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 154 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,080 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for TYLG (65.5% of the fund), and 4 for TYLG that do not appear in VTI (54.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TYLG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.63% | 6.40% | 0.23% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.12% | 6.29% | 0.17% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.62% | 4.79% | 0.17% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.15% | 2.56% | 0.41% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.90% | 1.29% | 0.61% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.01% | 1.08% | 0.93% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.56% | 0.50% | 1.06% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.35% | 0.57% | 0.78% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.55% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.14% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
46.4% of TYLG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TYLG or VTI?
TYLG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TYLG or VTI?
Over the past year TYLG returned +34.91% vs +16.92% for VTI, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TYLG annualized +26.66% vs +19.75% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TYLG or VTI?
TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 13.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TYLG -24.5% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both TYLG and VTI?
TYLG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TYLG and VTI?
46.4% of TYLG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 31.9% of VTI's is in holdings TYLG also owns. They hold 70 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in TYLG and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, TYLG or VTI?
TYLG yields 8.68% while VTI yields 1.03%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than TYLG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. TYLG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.