TYLG vs VYM
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, TYLG or VYM?
Option Writing against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. TYLG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TYLG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $15M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.68% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 77 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +22.48%Best | +12.87% |
| 1Y Return | +30.69%Best | +17.25% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.82%Best | +17.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 11.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $23,320Best | $16,018 |
| Top 10 Weight | 81.6% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 21, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 22, 2022 to Sep 15, 2026 (3.8 years).
TYLG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.
TYLG vs VYM Performance
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TYLG returned +30.69% while VYM returned +17.25%. Year to date, TYLG is up 22.48% versus a gain of 12.87% for VYM.
Over three years, TYLG compounded at +23.82% per year against +17.66% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, TYLG has the edge at +24.96% annualized vs +13.20%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TYLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 11.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for TYLG and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TYLG charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TYLG currently yields 8.68% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
8.4% of TYLG's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 15.4% of VYM's money is in holdings TYLG also owns.
VYM and TYLG share little of their money.
19 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in TYLG and 557 in VYM, against full books of 77 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 74 and 557 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 509 positions TYLG does not, 81.7% of the fund.
Largest: JPM 3.82%, XOM 2.63%, JNJ 2.51%, ABBV 1.80%, BAC 1.66%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TYLG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.24% | 7.35% | 5.11% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.35% | 1.86% | 0.51% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.72% | 1.02% | 0.30% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 0.75% | 0.90% | 0.15% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.17% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.54% | 0.73% | 0.19% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.55% | 0.63% | 0.08% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 0.39% | 0.50% | 0.11% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 0.21% | 0.26% | 0.05% |
| TELTE Connectivity PLC Common Stock | 0.19% | 0.24% | 0.05% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of TYLG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TYLG or VYM?
TYLG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TYLG or VYM?
Over the past year TYLG returned +30.69% vs +17.25% for VYM, so TYLG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TYLG annualized +24.96% vs +13.20% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TYLG or VYM?
TYLG has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 11.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: TYLG -24.5% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both TYLG and VYM?
TYLG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TYLG and VYM?
15.4% of VYM's money is in holdings TYLG also owns. 15.4% of VYM's is in holdings TYLG also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in TYLG and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, TYLG or VYM?
TYLG yields 8.68% while VYM yields 2.22%, so TYLG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than TYLG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. TYLG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 81.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.