VFH vs VTI
Vanguard Financials ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, VFH or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VFH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $14.9B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 429 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +5.27% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.49% | +17.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.70% | +20.87%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.57% | +11.86%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.3% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -79.9% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,527 | $17,514Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2004 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 30, 2004 to Sep 11, 2026 (22.6 years).
VFH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 22.6 years both funds cover.
VFH vs VTI Performance
Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VFH returned +7.49% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, VFH is up 5.27% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Over three years, VFH compounded at +20.70% per year against +20.87% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.57% and +11.86% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.28% annualized vs +5.18%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VFH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 15.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.9% for VFH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VFH charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VFH currently yields 1.67% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 95.4% of VFH's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of VFH is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
335 positions in common, counted across the 418 positions we hold weights for in VFH and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 429 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VFH | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 10.45% | 1.11% | 9.34% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway B | 7.88% | 1.24% | 6.64% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 5.20% | 0.56% | 4.64% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 4.66% | 0.50% | 4.16% |
| VVisa Inc | 4.33% | 0.77% | 3.56% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc. | 3.16% | 0.39% | 2.77% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 2.93% | 0.35% | 2.58% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 2.76% | 0.34% | 2.42% |
| MKLMarkel Corp. | 2.85% | 0.17% | 2.68% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 2.42% | 0.32% | 2.10% |
95.4% of VFH is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VFH or VTI?
VFH has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VFH or VTI?
Over the past year VFH returned +7.49% vs +17.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), VFH annualized +5.18% vs +9.28% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VFH or VTI?
VFH has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VFH -79.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both VFH and VTI?
VFH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VFH and VTI?
At least 95.4% of VFH's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 335 positions in common, counted across the 418 positions we hold weights for in VFH and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, VFH or VTI?
VFH yields 1.67% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VFH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than VFH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.