VIG vs XLK
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF vs State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Quick Verdict
VIG has a lower expense ratio. XLK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VIG offers more diversification with 335 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VIG | XLK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.08% | |
| AUM | $111.4B | $124.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 0.45% | |
| Holdings | 335 | 77 | |
| YTD Return | +12.14% | +32.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.72% | +42.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.93% | +32.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.54% | +20.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 23.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.2% | -82.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 21, 2006 | Dec 16, 1998 |
VIG vs XLK Performance
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year VIG returned +18.72% while XLK returned +42.69%. Year to date, VIG is up 12.14% versus a gain of 32.00% for XLK.
Over three years, VIG compounded at +16.93% per year against +32.19% for XLK; over five years the annualized figures are +10.54% and +20.47% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, XLK has the edge at +9.52% annualized vs +8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XLK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.2% compared with 13.3% for VIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.2% for VIG and -82.0% for XLK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VIG charges 0.04% per year while XLK charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $8 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VIG currently yields 1.49% against 0.45% for XLK.
Holdings Overlap
VIG and XLK share 18 holdings out of 388 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VIG or XLK?
VIG has an expense ratio of 0.04% while XLK charges 0.08%. VIG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VIG or XLK?
Over the past year VIG returned +18.72% vs +42.69% for XLK, so XLK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), VIG annualized +8.68% vs +9.52% for XLK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VIG or XLK?
XLK has been the more volatile fund at 23.2% annualized versus 13.3% for VIG. Worst drawdown: VIG -48.2% vs XLK -82.0%.
Should I hold both VIG and XLK?
VIG and XLK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VIG and XLK?
VIG and XLK share 18 common holdings with a 25.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 388 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VIG or XLK?
VIG yields 1.49% while XLK yields 0.45%, so VIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.