VOE vs VONG
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
VOE has a lower expense ratio. VOE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VONG offers more diversification with 386 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOE | VONG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $22.9B | $44.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.31% | 0.54% | |
| Holdings | 177 | 390 | |
| YTD Return | +18.67% | +6.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.06% | +12.33% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.05% | +22.84% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.16% | +12.91% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 15.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.4% | -32.7% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 17, 2006 | Sep 20, 2010 |
VOE vs VONG Performance
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VOE returned +25.06% while VONG returned +12.33%. Year to date, VOE is up 18.67% versus a gain of 6.80% for VONG.
Over three years, VOE compounded at +17.05% per year against +22.84% for VONG; over five years the annualized figures are +10.16% and +12.91% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VONG has the edge at +15.85% annualized vs +8.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.9% for VONG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.4% for VOE and -32.7% for VONG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOE charges 0.05% per year while VONG charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $6 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOE currently yields 2.31% against 0.54% for VONG.
Holdings Overlap
VOE and VONG share 25 holdings out of 530 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOE or VONG?
VOE has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VONG charges 0.06%. VOE is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOE or VONG?
Over the past year VOE returned +25.06% vs +12.33% for VONG, so VOE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VOE annualized +8.02% vs +15.85% for VONG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOE or VONG?
VOE has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.9% for VONG. Worst drawdown: VOE -63.4% vs VONG -32.7%.
Should I hold both VOE and VONG?
VOE and VONG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOE and VONG?
VOE and VONG share 25 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 530 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOE or VONG?
VOE yields 2.31% while VONG yields 0.54%, so VOE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.