VOE vs VT

VOE vs VT

Which is better, VOE or VT?

Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VOE has a lower expense ratio. VOE led over 1Y and the full window, VT over 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.

Lower Fees: VOEHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVOEVT
Expense Ratio0.05%Best0.06%
AUM$23.9B$97.9B
Dividend Yield1.80%1.55%
Holdings17610,133
YTD Return+14.09%Best+12.24%
1Y Return+19.17%Best+17.11%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.64%+20.23%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+10.14%+11.20%Best
Volatility (annualized)17.9%16.6%Best
Max Drawdown-52.7%-50.6%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$16,208$17,003Best
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 17, 2006Jun 24, 2008

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2008 to Sep 18, 2026 (18.2 years).

VOE vs VT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.2 years both funds cover.

VOE vs VT Performance

Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VOE returned +19.17% while VT returned +17.11%. Year to date, VOE is up 14.09% versus a gain of 12.24% for VT.

Over three years, VOE compounded at +16.64% per year against +20.23% for VT; over five years the annualized figures are +10.14% and +11.20% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VOE has the edge at +8.87% annualized vs +7.22%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 16.6% for VT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.7% for VOE and -50.6% for VT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VOE charges 0.05% per year while VT charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $6 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOE currently yields 1.80% against 1.55% for VT.

Holdings Overlap

VOE already in VT91.6%

At least 91.6% of VOE's money is in holdings VT also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VT, our book for it covers 90.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

Most of VOE is already inside VT. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

156 positions in common, counted across the 171 positions we hold weights for in VOE and 9,272 in VT, against full books of 176 and 10,133.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VOEWeight in VTDifference
VLOValero Energy1.55%0.08%1.47%
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp1.54%0.08%1.46%
CMICummins Inc.1.46%0.07%1.39%
PSXPhillips 661.41%0.07%1.34%
GMGeneral Motors Co1.34%0.07%1.27%
SLBSchlumberger Nv.1.24%0.06%1.18%
SPGSimon Property Group Inc1.18%0.06%1.12%
PCARPaccar Inc.1.16%0.06%1.10%
URIUnited Rentals Inc.1.13%0.06%1.07%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.1.10%0.06%1.04%

91.6% of VOE is already inside VT.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

VOEVT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VOE or VT?

VOE has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VT charges 0.06%. VOE is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, VOE or VT?

Over the past year VOE returned +19.17% vs +17.11% for VT, so VOE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), VOE annualized +8.87% vs +7.22% for VT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VOE or VT?

VOE has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 16.6% for VT. Worst drawdown: VOE -52.7% vs VT -50.6%.

Should I hold both VOE and VT?

VOE and VT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between VOE and VT?

At least 91.6% of VOE's money is in holdings VT also owns. Our book for VT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 156 positions in common, counted across the 171 positions we hold weights for in VOE and 9,272 in VT.

Which pays a higher dividend, VOE or VT?

VOE yields 1.80% while VT yields 1.55%, so VOE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VT better than VOE?

VOE has a lower expense ratio. VOE led over 1Y and the full window, VT over 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.