VOE vs VT
Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VOE has a lower expense ratio. VOE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VT offers more diversification with 10,133 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOE | VT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $23.9B | $78.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.81% | 1.60% | |
| Holdings | 176 | 10,133 | |
| YTD Return | +17.24% | +13.98% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.74% | +21.80% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.10% | +20.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.86% | +10.83% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 16.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.4% | -50.6% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 17, 2006 | Jun 24, 2008 |
VOE vs VT Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VOE returned +22.74% while VT returned +21.80%. Year to date, VOE is up 17.24% versus a gain of 13.98% for VT.
Over three years, VOE compounded at +17.10% per year against +20.40% for VT; over five years the annualized figures are +9.86% and +10.83% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VOE has the edge at +7.94% annualized vs +7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 16.6% for VT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.4% for VOE and -50.6% for VT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOE charges 0.05% per year while VT charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $6 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOE currently yields 1.81% against 1.60% for VT.
Holdings Overlap
VOE and VT share 154 holdings out of 8943 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOE or VT?
VOE has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VT charges 0.06%. VOE is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOE or VT?
Over the past year VOE returned +22.74% vs +21.80% for VT, so VOE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), VOE annualized +7.94% vs +7.33% for VT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOE or VT?
VOE has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 16.6% for VT. Worst drawdown: VOE -63.4% vs VT -50.6%.
Should I hold both VOE and VT?
VOE and VT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VOE and VT?
VOE and VT share 154 common holdings with a 5.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8943 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOE or VT?
VOE yields 1.81% while VT yields 1.60%, so VOE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.