VOO vs VSDA
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
Which is better, VOO or VSDA?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VSDA is less concentrated, with 28.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | VSDA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.35% |
| AUM | $997.4B | $222M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 2.47% |
| Holdings | 509 | 77 |
| YTD Return | +13.37% | +13.68%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.08%Best | +12.83% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29%Best | +12.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.89%Best | +7.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -32.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,335Best | $14,659 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.4% | 28.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Victory Capital Management Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Apr 18, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 18, 2017 to Sep 4, 2026 (9.4 years).
VOO vs VSDA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.4 years both funds cover.
VOO vs VSDA Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) is an ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc.. Over the past year VOO returned +20.08% while VSDA returned +12.83%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.37% versus a gain of 13.68% for VSDA.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.29% per year against +12.30% for VSDA; over five years the annualized figures are +12.89% and +7.95% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.51% annualized vs +10.97%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 15.0% for VSDA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -32.2% for VSDA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while VSDA charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 2.47% for VSDA.
Holdings Overlap
12.4% of VOO's money is in holdings VSDA also owns. 87.4% of VSDA's money is in holdings VOO also owns.
Most of VSDA is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
63 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 75 in VSDA, against full books of 509 and 77.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 505 and 75 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 434 positions VSDA does not, 87.1% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.51%, AAPL 6.59%, MSFT 4.30%, AMZN 3.62%, GOOGL 3.25%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VOO | Weight in VSDA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.19% | 3.02% | 2.83% |
| KMBKimberly-Clark Corp. | 0.06% | 3.13% | 3.07% |
| CLXClorox Co. | 0.02% | 3.16% | 3.14% |
| HRLHormel Foods Corp. | 0.01% | 3.13% | 3.12% |
| MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.16% | 2.85% | 2.69% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.48% | 2.45% | 1.97% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.29% | 2.60% | 2.31% |
| TROWT Rowe Price Grp | 0.04% | 2.70% | 2.66% |
| MKCMccormick & Co Inc. | 0.02% | 2.50% | 2.48% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.88% | 1.62% | 0.74% |
87.4% of VSDA is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or VSDA?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VSDA charges 0.35%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VOO or VSDA?
Over the past year VOO returned +20.08% vs +12.83% for VSDA, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), VOO annualized +14.51% vs +10.97% for VSDA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VOO or VSDA?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 15.0% for VSDA. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs VSDA -32.2%.
Should I hold both VOO and VSDA?
VOO and VSDA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and VSDA?
87.4% of VSDA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 87.4% of VSDA's is in holdings VOO also owns. They hold 63 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 75 in VSDA.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or VSDA?
VOO yields 1.08% while VSDA yields 2.47%, so VSDA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VSDA better than VOO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VSDA is less concentrated, with 28.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.