VOO vs WNTR
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | WNTR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.00% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $82M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 106.61% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 21 | |
| YTD Return | +12.68% | -41.94% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.87% | -0.46% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.06% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 59.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -53.1% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | YieldMax ETF | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Mar 26, 2025 |
VOO vs WNTR Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% while WNTR returned -0.46%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.68% versus a loss of 41.94% for WNTR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WNTR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 59.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -53.1% for WNTR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while WNTR charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $100 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 106.61% for WNTR.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and WNTR share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or WNTR?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WNTR charges 1.00%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or WNTR?
Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% vs -0.46% for WNTR, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), VOO annualized +13.47% vs -8.78% for WNTR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or WNTR?
WNTR has been the more volatile fund at 59.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs WNTR -53.1%.
Should I hold both VOO and WNTR?
VOO and WNTR have a monthly-return correlation of -0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and WNTR?
VOO and WNTR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or WNTR?
VOO yields 1.08% while WNTR yields 106.61%, so WNTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.