VOO vs ZIG
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs The Acquirers Fund ETF
Which is better, VOO or ZIG?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | ZIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $997.4B | $33M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 1.75% |
| Holdings | 509 | 34 |
| YTD Return | +13.37%Best | +10.92% |
| 1Y Return | +20.08%Best | +5.05% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29%Best | +10.32% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.89%Best | +8.71% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4%Best | 20.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3%Best | -37.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,335Best | $15,183 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.4%Best | 38.5% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Acquirers Funds, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | May 14, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2019 to Sep 4, 2026 (7.3 years).
VOO vs ZIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.3 years both funds cover.
VOO vs ZIG Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and The Acquirers Fund ETF (ZIG) is an ETF from Acquirers Funds, LLC. Over the past year VOO returned +20.08% while ZIG returned +5.05%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.37% versus a gain of 10.92% for ZIG.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.29% per year against +10.32% for ZIG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.89% and +8.71% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.81% annualized vs +7.83%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 16.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -37.1% for ZIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while ZIG charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 1.75% for ZIG.
Holdings Overlap
1.3% of VOO's money is in holdings ZIG also owns. 40.7% of ZIG's money is in holdings VOO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, VOO as of Jun 30, 2026 and ZIG as of Aug 18, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
12 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 32 in ZIG, against full books of 509 and 34.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 17 positions for ZIG that do not appear in our book for VOO (55.5% of the fund), and 485 for VOO that do not appear in ZIG (98.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VOO | Weight in ZIG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| APAApa Corp | 0.02% | 4.19% | 4.17% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 0.21% | 3.88% | 3.67% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 0.03% | 3.79% | 3.76% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.11% | 3.70% | 3.59% |
| ULTAUlta Beauty Inc. | 0.03% | 3.65% | 3.62% |
| SYFSynchrony Financial | 0.04% | 3.46% | 3.42% |
| DPZDomino's Pizza Inc | 0.01% | 3.44% | 3.43% |
| LULULululemon Athletica, Inc | 0.02% | 3.41% | 3.39% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 0.19% | 3.05% | 2.86% |
| NVRNvr Inc. | 0.03% | 3.10% | 3.07% |
40.7% of ZIG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or ZIG?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZIG charges 0.75%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VOO or ZIG?
Over the past year VOO returned +20.08% vs +5.05% for ZIG, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), VOO annualized +15.81% vs +7.83% for ZIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VOO or ZIG?
ZIG has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 16.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs ZIG -37.1%.
Should I hold both VOO and ZIG?
VOO and ZIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and ZIG?
40.7% of ZIG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 40.7% of ZIG's is in holdings VOO also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 32 in ZIG.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or ZIG?
VOO yields 1.08% while ZIG yields 1.75%, so ZIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZIG better than VOO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.