VOO vs ZIG
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs The Acquirers Fund ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | ZIG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.75% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $33M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 1.75% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 33 | |
| YTD Return | +14.27% | +10.77% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +9.67% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +10.59% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | +8.31% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 20.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -37.1% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Acquirers Funds, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | May 14, 2019 |
VOO vs ZIG Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and The Acquirers Fund ETF (ZIG) is a ETF from Acquirers Funds, LLC. Over the past year VOO returned +21.79% while ZIG returned +9.67%. Year to date, VOO is up 14.27% versus a gain of 10.77% for ZIG.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +22.19% per year against +10.59% for ZIG; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +8.31% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -37.1% for ZIG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while ZIG charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 1.75% for ZIG.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and ZIG share 12 holdings out of 526 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or ZIG?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZIG charges 0.75%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or ZIG?
Over the past year VOO returned +21.79% vs +9.67% for ZIG, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), VOO annualized +13.59% vs +7.87% for ZIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or ZIG?
ZIG has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs ZIG -37.1%.
Should I hold both VOO and ZIG?
VOO and ZIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and ZIG?
VOO and ZIG share 12 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 526 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or ZIG?
VOO yields 1.08% while ZIG yields 1.75%, so ZIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.