VOT vs VTV
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Value ETF
Quick Verdict
VTV has a lower expense ratio. VTV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTV offers more diversification with 308 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOT | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $19.9B | $186.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 2.29% | |
| Holdings | 136 | 311 | |
| YTD Return | +11.80% | +18.99% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.62% | +28.20% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.13% | +18.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.98% | +12.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.3% | -61.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 17, 2006 | Jan 26, 2004 |
VOT vs VTV Performance
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VOT returned +9.62% while VTV returned +28.20%. Year to date, VOT is up 11.80% versus a gain of 18.99% for VTV.
Over three years, VOT compounded at +16.13% per year against +18.75% for VTV; over five years the annualized figures are +5.98% and +12.47% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VOT has the edge at +9.74% annualized vs +7.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 14.5% for VTV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.3% for VOT and -61.3% for VTV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOT charges 0.05% per year while VTV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOT currently yields 0.65% against 2.29% for VTV.
Holdings Overlap
VOT and VTV share 44 holdings out of 385 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOT or VTV?
VOT has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VTV charges 0.03%. VTV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOT or VTV?
Over the past year VOT returned +9.62% vs +28.20% for VTV, so VTV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), VOT annualized +9.74% vs +7.64% for VTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOT or VTV?
VOT has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 14.5% for VTV. Worst drawdown: VOT -60.3% vs VTV -61.3%.
Should I hold both VOT and VTV?
VOT and VTV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOT and VTV?
VOT and VTV share 44 common holdings with a 4.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 385 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOT or VTV?
VOT yields 0.65% while VTV yields 2.29%, so VTV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.