VTI vs XLRE
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR ETF
Which is better, VTI or XLRE?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XLRE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.08% |
| AUM | $690.1B | $7.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 3.19% |
| Holdings | 3,524 | 66 |
| YTD Return | +14.54%Best | +5.53% |
| 1Y Return | +16.83%Best | +4.74% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.56%Best | +10.57% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.76%Best | +2.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 17.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0%Best | -39.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,230Best | $11,041 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3%Best | 61.7% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Oct 7, 2015 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 8, 2015 to Oct 9, 2026 (11 years).
VTI vs XLRE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11 years both funds cover.
VTI vs XLRE Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLRE) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year VTI returned +16.83% while XLRE returned +4.74%. Year to date, VTI is up 14.54% versus a gain of 5.53% for XLRE.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +22.56% per year against +10.57% for XLRE; over five years the annualized figures are +12.76% and +2.00% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.39% annualized vs +4.76%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XLRE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for VTI and -39.3% for XLRE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XLRE charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $8 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 3.19% for XLRE.
Holdings Overlap
1.7% of VTI's money is in holdings XLRE also owns. 99.8% of XLRE's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Most of XLRE is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
30 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 31 in XLRE, against full books of 3,524 and 66.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for XLRE that do not appear in our book for VTI (0.0% of the fund), and 1,120 for VTI that do not appear in XLRE (95.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in XLRE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WELLWelltower, Inc. | 0.23% | 11.58% | 11.35% |
| PLDPrologis Inc | 0.19% | 8.96% | 8.77% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 0.14% | 7.13% | 6.99% |
| AMTAmerican Tower Corporation | 0.11% | 5.77% | 5.66% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 0.09% | 5.08% | 4.99% |
| EQRVivmark Residential | 0.03% | 5.05% | 5.02% |
| SPGSimon Property Group Inc | 0.10% | 4.62% | 4.52% |
| VTRVentas Inc . | 0.06% | 4.59% | 4.53% |
| PSAPublic Storage | 0.08% | 4.49% | 4.41% |
| ORealty Income Corp. | 0.08% | 4.43% | 4.35% |
99.8% of XLRE is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XLRE?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XLRE charges 0.08%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or XLRE?
Over the past year VTI returned +16.83% vs +4.74% for XLRE, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), VTI annualized +13.39% vs +4.76% for XLRE. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or XLRE?
XLRE has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -35.0% vs XLRE -39.3%.
Should I hold both VTI and XLRE?
VTI and XLRE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and XLRE?
99.8% of XLRE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 99.8% of XLRE's is in holdings VTI also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 31 in XLRE.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XLRE?
VTI yields 1.03% while XLRE yields 3.19%, so XLRE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XLRE better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.