VTI vs XMVM
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. XMVM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XMVM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $516M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.78% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 82 | |
| YTD Return | +12.65% | +16.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.39% | +31.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | +18.76% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.11% | +12.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 19.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -63.8% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Mar 3, 2005 |
VTI vs XMVM Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year VTI returned +21.39% while XMVM returned +31.88%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.65% versus a gain of 16.18% for XMVM.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.54% per year against +18.76% for XMVM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.11% and +12.24% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, XMVM has the edge at +8.17% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XMVM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -63.8% for XMVM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XMVM charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $39 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 1.78% for XMVM.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and XMVM share 56 holdings out of 2811 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XMVM?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XMVM charges 0.39%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or XMVM?
Over the past year VTI returned +21.39% vs +31.88% for XMVM, so XMVM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), VTI annualized +8.07% vs +8.17% for XMVM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or XMVM?
XMVM has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs XMVM -63.8%.
Should I hold both VTI and XMVM?
VTI and XMVM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and XMVM?
VTI and XMVM share 56 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2811 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XMVM?
VTI yields 1.07% while XMVM yields 1.78%, so XMVM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.