VUSV vs VYM

VUSV vs VYM

Which is better, VUSV or VYM?

VYM costs less.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.6%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVUSVVYM
Expense Ratio0.30%0.04%Best
AUM$82M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.17%2.22%
Holdings80613
YTD Return+10.97%Best+10.96%
1Y Return-+15.42%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.78%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.05%
Top 10 Weight27.6%26.1%Best
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionNov 14, 2025Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

VUSV vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

VUSV vs VYM Performance

Vanguard Wellington US Value Active ETF (VUSV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, VUSV is up 10.97% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VUSV charges 0.30% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $4 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VUSV currently yields 0.17% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

VUSV already in VYM40.8%
VYM already in VUSV18.3%

40.8% of VUSV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 18.3% of VYM's money is in holdings VUSV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

34 positions in common, counted across the 83 positions we hold weights for in VUSV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 80 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 494 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for VUSV (78.8% of the fund), and 40 for VUSV that do not appear in VYM (48.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VUSVWeight in VYMDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc0.27%7.35%7.08%
MRKMerck & Company Inc2.66%1.31%1.35%
MSMorgan Stanley2.15%0.96%1.19%
UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated1.45%1.52%0.07%
WFCWells Fargo & Co.1.62%1.07%0.55%
CBChubb Ltd Common Stock Usd 24.152.12%0.50%1.62%
DISWalt Disney Co1.62%0.69%0.93%
COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.011.42%0.60%0.82%
EMREmerson Electric Co.1.60%0.34%1.26%
SLBSchlumberger Nv.1.50%0.30%1.20%

40.8% of VUSV is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

VUSVVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VUSV or VYM?

VUSV has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between VUSV and VYM?

40.8% of VUSV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 18.3% of VYM's is in holdings VUSV also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 83 positions we hold weights for in VUSV and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, VUSV or VYM?

VUSV yields 0.17% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than VUSV?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.