QQQ vs VUSV

QQQ vs VUSV

Which is better, QQQ or VUSV?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. VUSV is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: VUSV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQVUSV
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.30%
AUM$483.5B$82M
Dividend Yield0.44%0.17%
Holdings10780
YTD Return+17.95%Best+10.22%
1Y Return+21.77%-
3Y Return (annualized)+25.63%-
5Y Return (annualized)+15.24%-
Top 10 Weight46.5%27.6%Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 10, 1999Nov 14, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs VUSV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs VUSV Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Wellington US Value Active ETF (VUSV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a gain of 10.22% for VUSV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while VUSV charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $30 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.17% for VUSV.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in VUSV27.8%
VUSV already in QQQ24.0%

27.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings VUSV also owns. 24.0% of VUSV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

QQQ and VUSV share little of their money.

14 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 83 in VUSV, against full books of 107 and 80.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 61 positions for VUSV that do not appear in our book for QQQ (67.4% of the fund), and 83 for QQQ that do not appear in VUSV (70.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in VUSVDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.76%6.14%0.38%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.67%5.53%0.86%
NVDANvidia Corp8.44%0.92%7.52%
GOOGAlphabet Inc3.13%1.43%1.70%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.16%0.27%2.89%
ASL:ASAsml Holding Nv Unsponsored Adr Ordinary Shares0.68%1.62%0.94%
FANGDiamondback Energy, Inc.0.23%1.51%1.28%
PCARPaccar Inc.0.31%1.20%0.89%
ABNBAirbnb Inc0.28%1.23%0.95%
NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn70.26%1.00%0.74%

27.8% of QQQ is already inside VUSV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQVUSV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or VUSV?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VUSV charges 0.30%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and VUSV?

27.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings VUSV also owns. 24.0% of VUSV's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 83 in VUSV.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or VUSV?

QQQ yields 0.44% while VUSV yields 0.17%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VUSV better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. VUSV is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.