VXUS vs XOVR
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF vs ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VXUS | XOVR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 1.81% | |
| AUM | $158.1B | $1.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.59% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 8,747 | 33 | |
| YTD Return | +15.22% | +2.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.86% | +3.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.34% | +20.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.38% | +5.15% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 24.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -56.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | ERShares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2011 | Nov 7, 2017 |
VXUS vs XOVR Performance
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) is a ETF from ERShares. Over the past year VXUS returned +26.86% while XOVR returned +3.22%. Year to date, VXUS is up 15.22% versus a gain of 2.80% for XOVR.
Over three years, VXUS compounded at +20.34% per year against +20.24% for XOVR; over five years the annualized figures are +9.38% and +5.15% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, XOVR has the edge at +10.58% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XOVR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for VXUS and -56.3% for XOVR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VXUS charges 0.05% per year while XOVR charges 1.81%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $181 annually, a gap of $176 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VXUS currently yields 2.59% against 0.00% for XOVR.
Holdings Overlap
VXUS and XOVR share 0 holdings out of 7899 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VXUS or XOVR?
VXUS has an expense ratio of 0.05% while XOVR charges 1.81%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $176 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VXUS or XOVR?
Over the past year VXUS returned +26.86% vs +3.22% for XOVR, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), VXUS annualized +4.89% vs +10.58% for XOVR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VXUS or XOVR?
XOVR has been the more volatile fund at 24.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: VXUS -39.9% vs XOVR -56.3%.
Should I hold both VXUS and XOVR?
VXUS and XOVR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VXUS and XOVR?
VXUS and XOVR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7899 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VXUS or XOVR?
VXUS yields 2.59% while XOVR yields 0.00%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.