ACKY vs VTI
VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ACKY or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 90.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACKY | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $45M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 15.84% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 37 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -1.72% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.21% | +18.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $10,104 | $11,881Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 90.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | VistaShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 9, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2025 to Sep 25, 2026 (1 years).
ACKY vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
ACKY vs VTI Performance
VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF (ACKY) is an ETF from VistaShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACKY returned +1.21% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, ACKY is down 1.72% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ACKY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 12.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for ACKY and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACKY charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACKY currently yields 15.84% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
70.0% of ACKY's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 12.4% of VTI's money is in holdings ACKY also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 15 positions we hold weights for in ACKY and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 37 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,142 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ACKY (85.1% of the fund), and 3 for ACKY that do not appear in VTI (18.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACKY | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 11.16% | 4.79% | 6.37% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 9.67% | 3.65% | 6.02% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 11.01% | 0.20% | 10.81% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 9.05% | 1.70% | 7.35% |
| HHHHoward Hughes Corp. | 9.00% | 0.00% | 9.00% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 5.20% | 0.83% | 4.37% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 4.99% | 0.63% | 4.36% |
| SPGIS&p Global Inc. | 4.94% | 0.16% | 4.78% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 4.17% | 0.42% | 3.75% |
| SEGSeaport Entertainment Group, Inc. | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.61% |
70.0% of ACKY is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACKY or VTI?
ACKY has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACKY or VTI?
Over the past year ACKY returned +1.21% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ACKY annualized +1.04% vs +18.81% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACKY or VTI?
ACKY has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 12.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ACKY -14.6% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both ACKY and VTI?
ACKY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACKY and VTI?
70.0% of ACKY's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 12.4% of VTI's is in holdings ACKY also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 15 positions we hold weights for in ACKY and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACKY or VTI?
ACKY yields 15.84% while VTI yields 1.03%, so ACKY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ACKY?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 90.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.