AEMG vs VOO

AEMG vs VOO

Which is better, AEMG or VOO?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. AEMG is less concentrated, with 28.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: AEMG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAEMGVOO
Expense Ratio0.38%0.03%Best
AUM-$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings115509
YTD Return-4.73%+11.48%Best
1Y Return-+15.94%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.66%
Top 10 Weight28.5%Best37.6%
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 26, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AEMG vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AEMG vs VOO Performance

Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Growth ETF (AEMG) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, AEMG is down 4.73% versus a gain of 11.48% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AEMG charges 0.38% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AEMG currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

AEMG already in VOO48.6%
VOO already in AEMG2.7%

48.6% of AEMG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.7% of VOO's money is in holdings AEMG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

45 positions in common, counted across the 115 positions we hold weights for in AEMG and 494 in VOO, against full books of 115 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 443 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for AEMG (96.5% of the fund), and 64 for AEMG that do not appear in VOO (46.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AEMGWeight in VOODifference
FIXComfort Systems USA Inc.4.31%0.09%4.22%
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp3.29%0.14%3.15%
AMPAmeriprise Financial Inc3.06%0.08%2.98%
TERTeradyne Inc - Common2.74%0.09%2.65%
EXPEExpedia Group Inc (consumer Discretionary)2.74%0.05%2.69%
NTAPNetapp Inc2.54%0.05%2.49%
DDOGDatadog Inc2.26%0.14%2.12%
DXCMDexcom Inc.2.14%0.05%2.09%
CMGChipotle Mexican Grill Inc. Class A1.98%0.07%1.91%
STTState Street Corp.1.69%0.08%1.61%

48.6% of AEMG is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AEMGVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AEMG or VOO?

AEMG has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AEMG and VOO?

48.6% of AEMG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.7% of VOO's is in holdings AEMG also owns. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 115 positions we hold weights for in AEMG and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, AEMG or VOO?

AEMG yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than AEMG?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. AEMG is less concentrated, with 28.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.