AEMG vs IVV

AEMG vs IVV

Which is better, AEMG or IVV?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. AEMG is less concentrated, with 28.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: AEMG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAEMGIVV
Expense Ratio0.38%0.03%Best
AUM-$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings115508
YTD Return-4.73%+11.51%Best
1Y Return-+15.96%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.66%
Top 10 Weight28.5%Best37.8%
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 26, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

AEMG vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

AEMG vs IVV Performance

Harbor AlphaEdge Mid Cap Growth ETF (AEMG) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, AEMG is down 4.73% versus a gain of 11.51% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AEMG charges 0.38% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AEMG currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

AEMG already in IVV49.2%
IVV already in AEMG2.6%

49.2% of AEMG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.6% of IVV's money is in holdings AEMG also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

45 positions in common, counted across the 115 positions we hold weights for in AEMG and 490 in IVV, against full books of 115 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 437 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AEMG (96.0% of the fund), and 63 for AEMG that do not appear in IVV (45.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AEMGWeight in IVVDifference
FIXComfort Systems USA Inc.4.31%0.08%4.23%
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp3.29%0.16%3.13%
AMPAmeriprise Financial Inc3.06%0.08%2.98%
TERTeradyne Inc - Common2.74%0.08%2.66%
EXPEExpedia Group Inc (consumer Discretionary)2.74%0.05%2.69%
NTAPNetapp Inc2.54%0.06%2.48%
DDOGDatadog Inc2.26%0.12%2.14%
DXCMDexcom Inc.2.14%0.05%2.09%
CMGChipotle Mexican Grill Inc. Class A1.98%0.07%1.91%
STTState Street Corp.1.69%0.08%1.61%

49.2% of AEMG is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

AEMGIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AEMG or IVV?

AEMG has an expense ratio of 0.38% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between AEMG and IVV?

49.2% of AEMG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.6% of IVV's is in holdings AEMG also owns. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 115 positions we hold weights for in AEMG and 490 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, AEMG or IVV?

AEMG yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than AEMG?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. AEMG is less concentrated, with 28.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.